Your network, your impact. A safe space for innovators, entrepreneurs and changemakers.
· Contributor
We ran a small loan programme for four years. Repayment was 94 percent, which everyone told us was excellent. We closed it last year. The repayment number was hiding the thing that mattered. People were repaying on time by borrowing...
· Contributor
We have finished one of three. I want to write down what went wrong while it is fresh, because every project update I read only lists what went well. We sited the first borehole where the community leaders asked, not where the...
· Contributor
It costs two years of savings. I am not sure it changes anything about my classroom.
· Contributor
I have sent eleven. Two answers, both incomplete. Is this normal or am I doing it wrong?
· Contributor
Funders want stories. The families we work with did not sign up to be anybody story.
· Contributor
We get plenty of sign-ups after an event and almost nobody is still there by month four.
· Scout
Asking seriously. I have watched several good organisations continue for years past the point of usefulness because stopping feels like failure. I would like to hear from anyone who chose to close.
· Contributor
We can forecast a flood three days out. Evacuation still happens on the day, when it is dangerous.
Direct financial grants from a $50,000 pool to support international students pursuing academics, sports, or entrepreneurship in select countries.
· Scout
Hindi was excellent. Tamil was good. Bhojpuri and Santali were poor enough to be unusable for anything official. This is not a complaint, it is a planning point. If your programme depends on a model, test it on the languages your people...
